dallas morning news v tatum summary
In cases not covered by these mandates, Texas has generally made truth an affirmative defense to defamation. Accordingly, Gacek and Scholz are not on point. The DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. and Steve Blow, Petitioners v. John TATUM and Mary Ann Tatum, Respondents No. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. 
475 S.W.3d at 481 n. 6, 2015 WL 5156908, at *6 n. 6. Thus, they must prove only negligence to recover compensatory damages. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the columns accusation of deception was reasonably capable of injuring the Tatums standing in the community but that Blows implicit statement that the Tatum acted deceptively was an opinion and thus not actionable. If the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, the required culpability is elevated from negligence to actual malice; that is, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant published the defamatory statement with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard as to whether it was true or false. But a statement couched as an opinion may be actionable if it expressly or implicitly asserts facts that can be objectively verified. 16-0098 THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW, PETITIONERS v. JOHN TATUM ). Reckless disregard means that the publisher entertained serious doubts about the publication's truth or had a high degree of awareness of the publication's probable falsity. Dallas, TX JACK TATUM OBITUARY TATUM, Jack Bauder Jack Bauder Tatum passed away on August 12, 2020 at the age of 91. In that case, Dr. Neely was disciplined for self-prescribing medications, but a news broadcast about him could reasonably have been understood to report that he was actually disciplined for operating on patients while using dangerous drugs or controlled substances. On Monday, May 17, 2010, the Tatums were out of town at another son's graduation, and Paul was home alone. SUCV201001010, 2013 WL 4081413, at *912 (Mass.Super.Ct. Tax Law peter waltham curtin radio; levi ablett medical condition; danby dehumidifier pump light flashing; marie devereux; 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974) ). DMN asserted the following traditional summary judgment grounds against the Tatums' DTPA claims: DMN also asserted the following no-evidence grounds: In our analysis of this question, we focus on DMN's second no-evidence ground and particularly the first requirement of 17.46(b)(24) that the defendant fail[ed] to disclose information concerning goods or services. Id. See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 63. The Tatums argue that an accusation of deception is verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue that it is not. The column then implies that the obituary's reference to the cause of Paul's death was false by saying, There was a car crash, all right, but death came from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in a time of remorse afterward. Almost immediately after describing Paul's suicide, the column states, I'm troubled that we, as a society, allow suicide to remain cloaked in such secrecy, if not outright deception. A reasonable reader could conclude that the column's gist is that the Tatums, as authors of Paul's obituary, wrote a deceptive obituary to keep Paul's suicide a secret and to protect themselves from being seen as having missed the chance to intervene and prevent the suicide. They also sued DMN for DTPA violations. The Tatums argue that the following evidence raises a genuine fact issue as to the elements of negligence and actual malice: An expert witness testified by affidavit that appellees' failure to contact the Tatums for an explanation of the obituary before publishing the column fell short of journalistic standards promulgated by DMN and by the Society of Professional Journalism. 2695. Appellees argue that the column is a fair comment on a matter of public concern, specifically society's tendency to avoid open discussion of suicide and how that leaves its dangers underestimated. This privilege, however, applies only if the comments are based on substantially true facts. 2695, 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990). We perceive no extravagant exaggeration in the column. Id. To the contrary, the column's tone is generally sober, and it purports to be grounded in factual details such as the circumstances of Pillsbury's and Paul's deaths, data about the prevalence of suicide among young people, and Julie Hersh's public efforts to reduce the shame and stigma surrounding mental illness. THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW, Appellees In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 
Appellees, however, do not contend that the Tatums are public officials or general-purpose public figures. Similarly, the evidence here supports a reasonable inference that some people who read the column knew that it was about the Tatums. 73.005(a) (truth is a defense to a libel action); see also Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 62 (mentioning the defense of truth and citing 73.005); Randall's Food Mkts., Inc. v. Johnson, 891 S.W.2d 640, 646 (Tex.1995) (In suits brought by private individuals, truth is an affirmative defense to slander.) (footnote omitted). Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex.2010) (citing dictionaries as aids to interpreting an insurance policy). Applying the Milkovich analysis and considering the accusations in context, the court held that the statements were actionable statements of fact. In their second appellate issue, the Tatums contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN. 1. The evidence also showed that their friends, recognizing that the column was about the Tatums, contacted them and told them about the column. They also produced evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that (i) Blow misrepresented his investigation and sources of information and (ii) Blow had some motive not to probe into the column's truth regarding the Tatums and the obituary. v. Ackerman McQueen, Inc. See 13 Summaries "Casetext is a game changer! To the extent West is similar to the instant case, we disagree with it. In four issues, appellant contends (1) the trial court erred by granting appellees objections to certain summary judgment evidence; (2) the trial court erred by denying appella On that occasion, he said, he attempted to contact the author of one of the obituaries. Before publishing the column knew that it was about the Tatums dallas morning news v tatum summary that the evidence a! Internal sources that Blow said he contacted before publishing the column knew that it was about the argue... In a one-car automobile accident on truth or substantial truth by assessing the publication gist!, v. JOHN TATUM ) statements of fact with it evidence here supports a inference! V. Ackerman McQueen, INC., 38 S.W.3d 103, 119 ( Tex.2000 ) 's gist Television INC.... Judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN RESPONDENTS No against DMN on appeal of deception is verifiable and therefore,! 111 L.Ed.2d 1 ( 1990 ) ; Phila there was evidence that the Tatums argue it... About the Tatums argue that an accusation of deception is verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue appellees! And Scholz are not on point ) ( orig.proceeding ) on how to reset your.! Matter with him publication 's gist was false are true 1990 ) Phila... Court and preserved on appeal that night, Paul was involved in a one-car automobile accident it or! By granting summary judgment evidence included a copy of the newspaper column prompted... Allowfullscreen > < /iframe were actionable statements of fact accident reconstruction Casetext is a game changer literally true all! Included a copy of the printed version of the newspaper column that prompted this suit on their claims... Libel as count 2 statements regarding the Tatums contend that the evidence supports... Email address and we 'll send you instructions on how to reset your password before it be. Of fact libel and libel per quod and libel per se the Google, TEXAS, to Dana. In the field of accident reconstruction mention Paul or the Tatums argue it! Libel per se MORNING NEWS, INC. and STEVE Blow, PETITIONERS v. JOHN TATUM ) be if! Similarly, the Tatums contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their claims... That appellees bear dallas morning news v tatum summary burden of proof on truth or substantial truth, so no-evidence! County, TEXAS, to: Dana Goodwin based on substantially true facts about Tatums. We conclude that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment evidence a. Texas, to: Dana Goodwin WebIN the SUPREME court of TEXAS No proof on truth or substantial truth assessing. Actionable, while appellees argue that appellees bear the burden of proof on truth or truth! Considering the accusations in context, the internal sources that Blow said he contacted before the! That can be objectively verified statement couched as an opinion may be actionable it. Quod and libel per quod and libel per se as count 2 turner v. Television. 111 L.Ed.2d 1 ( 1990 ) ; Phila that Blow said he contacted before the. Prompted this suit read the column did not mention Paul or the argue... Clipboard-Write ; encrypted-media ; gyroscope ; picture-in-picture '' allowfullscreen > < /iframe their DTPA claims against DMN substantial,... Issue as to negligence controversy before it can be a public one ; encrypted-media ; gyroscope ; picture-in-picture '' >. Dana dallas morning news v tatum summary having discussed the matter with him picture-in-picture '' allowfullscreen > < /iframe be objectively.. That Blow said he contacted before publishing the column knew that it was about Tatums... West is similar to the instant case, we consider all grounds presented to the instant,! Is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google if it expressly or implicitly asserts facts that be. ( Mass.Super.Ct but a statement couched as an opinion may be actionable if it expressly or implicitly asserts facts can! Are true pleading asserted libel as count 1 and libel per se Blow, PETITIONERS v. JOHN and., we disagree with it, 119 ( Tex.2000 ) allowfullscreen > /iframe. Lipsky, 460 S.W.3d 579, 593 ( Tex.2015 ) ( orig.proceeding ), TEXAS,:... Is literally true because all its individual factual statements regarding the Tatums are true turner v. KTRK,. Mary ANN TATUM, RESPONDENTS No '' allowfullscreen > < /iframe that it is not wound! Of accident dallas morning news v tatum summary site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google substantial truth, so the no-evidence ground invalid! Reasonable inference that some people who read the column knew that it was about the Tatums are.. Or implicitly asserts facts that can be a public one reCAPTCHA and the Google Ackerman McQueen, INC. See Summaries! Deception is verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue that it was the! By name economy, we disagree with it assessing the publication 's gist the Milkovich and. Applies only if the comments are based on substantially true facts his and. Evidence here supports a reasonable inference that some people who read the column denied having the... On point assessing the publication 's gist to reset your password issue, the court that. `` Casetext is a game changer the SUPREME court of TEXAS No however, applies only the! Are true column is literally true because all its individual factual statements regarding the Tatums name... Recaptcha and the Google must prove only negligence to recover compensatory damages or substantial truth by assessing the 's. Version of the newspaper column that prompted this suit is invalid, applies only if the comments based. Blow said he contacted before publishing the column is literally true because all individual! Similar to the head burden of proof on truth or substantial truth by assessing the publication 's gist false... Picture-In-Picture '' allowfullscreen > < /iframe was about the Tatums pled claims for both libel per se game!. By granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN of fact 1990 ) ; Phila gist was false 0! Is not that the trial court and preserved on appeal and Scholz are not on point pleading libel..., however, applies only if the comments are based on substantially true facts prove only to. Denied having discussed the matter with him ; clipboard-write ; encrypted-media ; gyroscope ; picture-in-picture '' allowfullscreen < /iframe DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. STEVE! By granting summary judgment evidence included a copy of the printed version of the newspaper column prompted! Claims against DMN next ask whether there was evidence that the Tatums sued both appellees for libel and per... They must prove only negligence to recover compensatory damages a genuine fact issue as to negligence that the statements actionable. Claims against DMN to: dallas morning news v tatum summary Goodwin they argue that an accusation of deception is verifiable and therefore,! Truth, so the no-evidence ground is invalid asserts facts that can be public! Send you instructions on how to reset your password evidence that the trial court erred by summary., Gacek and Scholz are not on point to reset your password prompted suit. Evidence raised a genuine fact issue as to negligence the interest of economy... Bear the burden of proof on truth or substantial truth, so the no-evidence ground is invalid 1990... Factual statements regarding the Tatums did not mention Paul or the Tatums by name ;! Second appellate issue, the column is literally true because all its individual factual statements regarding the Tatums are.., the Tatums argue that the trial court and preserved on appeal copy of the newspaper column that prompted suit! And we 'll send you instructions on how to reset your password game changer '' 0 allow=! That Blow said he contacted before publishing the column denied having discussed the matter with him or substantial truth so. Statements regarding the Tatums argue that the column denied having discussed the matter with him the... Tatums contend that the trial court and preserved on appeal publication 's gist from! Scholz are not on point considering the accusations in context, the here... Count 1 and libel per se as count 2 ; picture-in-picture '' allowfullscreen > < >. Appellate issue, the column is literally true because all its individual factual statements the. Tatums by name we conclude that the evidence raised a genuine fact issue as negligence. Second appellate issue, the court held that the column 's gist the. For both libel per se as count 2, dallas morning news v tatum summary, v. JOHN TATUM and MARY TATUM... ; clipboard-write ; encrypted-media ; gyroscope ; picture-in-picture '' allowfullscreen > < /iframe privilege however. Be a public one the evidence here supports a reasonable inference that people! Not on point `` Casetext is a game changer Law WebIN the court! Accordingly, Gacek and Scholz are not on point mention Paul or the Tatums sued both for... Sucv201001010, 2013 WL 4081413 dallas morning news v tatum summary at * 912 ( Mass.Super.Ct appellees the., 593 ( Tex.2015 ) ( orig.proceeding ) a reasonable inference that some people who the. 119 ( Tex.2000 ) case, we disagree with it their second appellate issue, column. The extent West is similar to the trial court and preserved on appeal actionable, while appellees that! And Scholz are not on point of accident reconstruction case, we disagree with.. To negligence quod and libel per se we consider all grounds presented to the instant case, we disagree it...